Aggadata

All essays

The Day the Earth Held Its Breath

A single letter in Genesis, a verse in Psalms, and the world that waited for an answer — Part II

Shabbat 88a · Psalms 76:9 · Genesis 1:31 · Avodah Zarah 3a · Pesachim 68b

A word before we begin. What follows is one reading among many. Some of the people in these stories were great tzaddikim — men and women of a spiritual stature we cannot measure — and the sages who recorded them chose every word with care. We offer an interpretation, based on the text and the classical commentators, the Meforshim; we do not claim to have reached the depth of their thoughts or feelings. Where an essay says "he felt" or "the sages meant," read: "this is how the story, as we understand it, invites us to see them."

מִשָּׁמַיִם הִשְׁמַעְתָּ דִּין אֶרֶץ יָרְאָה וְשָׁקָטָה

"From heaven You made judgment heard; the earth feared, and was still." (Psalms 76:9)


Imagine that everything that exists, the oceans, the forests, the stars, the person reading this sentence, is waiting for an answer from a crowd of former slaves standing in a desert. If they say no, all of it goes back to nothing. Not destroyed. Unmade, as if it had never been.

That sounds like the premise of a film. It is the second movement of the passage in Shabbat 88a that these essays follow. The first movement, in the previous essay, showed God holding a mountain over the people's heads: accept the Torah, or this is your grave. The threat was to Israel. Now the Talmud raises the stakes past anything a mountain could do. The threat is to creation itself. Two sages of the land of Israel, Chizkiya and Reish Lakish, read one difficult verse in Psalms and one extra letter in Genesis. Between them they say that the universe was, for two and a half thousand years, on probation.

This is the essay about what kind of world the sages thought they lived in. It is larger than the mountain and, in a way, gentler, because the mountain was a threat and this is an explanation.

The text

Chizkiya begins, as the Talmud so often begins, with a verse that does not quite work:

אָמַר חִזְקִיָּה, מַאי דִּכְתִיב: ״מִשָּׁמַיִם הִשְׁמַעְתָּ דִּין אֶרֶץ יָרְאָה וְשָׁקָטָה״, אִם יָרְאָה — לָמָּה שָׁקְטָה? וְאִם שָׁקְטָה — לָמָּה יָרְאָה? אֶלָּא בַּתְּחִילָּה יָרְאָה וּלְבַסּוֹף שָׁקְטָה

Chizkiya said: What is the meaning of the verse, "From heaven You made judgment heard; the earth feared, and was still"? If it feared, why was it still? And if it was still, why did it fear? Rather: at first it feared, and at the end it was still.

Chizkiya reads din, judgment, as the Torah, the law heard from heaven at Sinai. He notices that the earth's reaction is described in two words that do not sit together. Fear is not stillness. So the verse must be describing two moments, one after the other. The earth was afraid. Then something happened. Then the earth was still.

What was it afraid of?

וְלָמָּה יָרְאָה? כִּדְרֵישׁ לָקִישׁ. דְּאָמַר רֵישׁ לָקִישׁ, מַאי דִּכְתִיב: ״וַיְהִי עֶרֶב וַיְהִי בֹקֶר יוֹם הַשִּׁשִּׁי״, ה׳ יְתֵירָה לָמָּה לִי? — מְלַמֵּד שֶׁהִתְנָה הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא עִם מַעֲשֵׂה בְרֵאשִׁית וְאָמַר לָהֶם: אִם יִשְׂרָאֵל מְקַבְּלִים הַתּוֹרָה — אַתֶּם מִתְקַיְּימִין, וְאִם לָאו — אֲנִי מַחֲזִיר אֶתְכֶם לְתוֹהוּ וָבוֹהוּ

And why did it fear? Because of what Reish Lakish said. For Reish Lakish said: What is the meaning of the verse, "And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day"? Why do I need the extra letter heh? It teaches that the Holy One, blessed be He, made a condition with the works of creation, and said to them: If Israel accepts the Torah, you endure. And if not — I return you to chaos and void.

What Reish Lakish saw sits in the first chapter of Genesis in Hebrew. Each day of creation ends with a formula: "and there was evening and there was morning, day one … a second day … a third day … a fourth day … a fifth day." No "the." Then the sixth day arrives, and the formula changes by one letter: yom ha-shishi, "the sixth day." The letter heh, the Hebrew "the," appears here and nowhere else in the chapter.

Reish Lakish asks what it is doing there, and answers: it points forward. Not "a sixth day" but the sixth day, the one that matters, the sixth of Sivan on which the Torah would be given. The whole of creation was finished on a condition. If they accept it, you stand. If not, back to tohu va-vohu, the "unformed and void" of the second verse of Genesis, before light, before anything. So the earth feared from the sixth day of creation until the sixth of Sivan, and when the Torah was accepted, the earth was still.

The Talmud repeats the teaching in Avodah Zarah 3a, in a courtroom scene. The nations at the end of days object that heaven and earth cannot testify, because they have a stake in the verdict. Reish Lakish's condition is the proof. Creation cannot be neutral about the Torah. Creation depends on it.¹

Chizkiya and Reish Lakish are sages of the land of Israel, of the third century.² The idea they build on is older: the Mishnah says the world stands on Torah, and the midrash says God looked into the Torah and created the world, as an architect works from a plan.³ Reish Lakish's contribution is to give the idea a date and a letter. The world was not only made for the Torah. It was made on condition that the Torah be accepted. The condition waited 2,448 years for its answer. The flood, the tower, Abraham, Egypt, the exodus: all of it happened inside a world that had not yet been told whether it would be allowed to go on.

The lessons

It is worth pausing on how strange this teaching is. Why would God finish creating the world and then tell it, in effect, "you might not last"? What kind of universe hangs on a decision made by human beings, and is that a magnificent thought or a terrifying one? Why is it the earth that fears, and not the heavens? Why does the Talmud place this teaching right after the mountain? And if the earth was "still" once the Torah was accepted, what are we to make of a world that has not, since then, been still at all? I think the answers turn on one idea the sages held and we mostly do not: that the physical existence of things rests on their moral purpose, and not the other way round.

1. Why the earth, and not the heavens

Chizkiya's verse says the earth feared. Not the heavens, from which the judgment was heard; not the sun and moon; not the angels. Why?

Because the Torah is an earthly thing. It is about fields and boundaries, wages and loans, what you may eat, whom you may marry, how you treat a stranger, what you do on the seventh day. It needs bodies that get hungry and tired. It needs people who can be tempted to steal and so can be commanded not to. The heavens have no use for it. This is the argument Moses will make to the angels, later in this series: did you go down to Egypt? Do you have a father and mother? Is there envy among you? The Torah was written for creatures who live on the ground.

So it is the ground that waits. The earth is not only the place where the drama happens. It is the interested party, the part of creation whose meaning depends on whether there will be people living by the Torah on it. The heavens would go on being heavens without Sinai. The earth, without Sinai, would be what Genesis calls it before the first word was spoken: formless and empty, matter without purpose. In the sages' understanding that is the same as no matter at all.⁴

2. A world that needs an answer

Here is the thought at the center of the passage, and it is worth saying plainly because it is so unlike the way we usually think.

Many modern people assume that the universe simply is, and that meaning, if there is any, is something added later: a late and local event, a flicker on one small planet, with the stars indifferent. Reish Lakish says the opposite. Meaning comes first. The world exists in order that there be a Torah lived on it, and until there was, its existence was not settled. The physical rests on the moral. The stars were waiting for the desert.

Is that magnificent or terrifying? Both, and I think the two words in Chizkiya's verse are the sages' way of saying so. Terrifying, the earth feared, because it means existence is not a neutral fact but a responsibility. The world is not a stage that would stand whether or not the play went on. The play is what holds up the stage. And magnificent, and was still, because it gives the human yes a weight beyond anything the mountain could give it. When the people at Sinai accepted the Torah, on this reading, they did not save only themselves. They confirmed the sun and the sea and every creature that would never hear the word Torah. A law accepted by one people, on behalf of everything.

This is the root of an idea Judaism has never let go of: that the world needs human beings who live by the Torah; that it is unfinished until we act. The later name for it is tikkun olam, repairing the world. Its oldest form is a letter heh and a frightened earth.

The previous essay left the mountain over our heads: a covenant accepted under a threat of death, and ratified freely nearly a thousand years later. This is also what explains it, why it had to be there, and the Maharal saw the reason first.⁵ Think about what Reish Lakish has just said. If the people in the desert say no, the sun goes out and the sea is unmade, as if they had never been. God could not put that to a vote. A vote can be taken again. What a people chooses one morning it can give back the next, and you do not hang a world on a promise that can be given back. So the mountain is not God being cruel to a people who had just said yes. It is God telling them the truth about what their yes was for. They were not deciding whether to have a religion. They were deciding whether the world goes on.

Two people can be forced to do the same thing, and only one of them has been wronged. A man who hands over his wallet at knifepoint has been wronged: the force served only the one holding the knife. A man grabbed by the arm as he steps in front of a bus has not been wronged, even if the grip was rough. The force served him. He has been held. And Reish Lakish adds that Israel was not alone at that curb. The sun, the sea, and everyone who would ever be born were standing behind them. The sages, by placing his saying right after Rav Avdimi's, are telling us which kind of mountain this was.

3. And then it was still

At first it feared, and at the end it was still. What does the stillness mean?

The plain answer is that it cannot mean the earth has been calm since Sinai. Anyone can see it has not. There have been earthquakes and famines and wars and two exiles, and everything the other essays on this site describe.

The sages meant something narrower and deeper. The earth's fear, in Chizkiya's verse, was the fear of not being, of going back to nothing. That fear ended in Sivan. Once the Torah was accepted, the world's existence was no longer in question. What remained in question was only what would be done in it. The stillness is not the absence of pain. It is solid ground underfoot. A world that knows it is wanted can bear a great deal. A world that does not know whether it is allowed to exist cannot bear anything.

There is one thing more. The Hebrew shakta, "was still," is the root the book of Judges uses when it says the land was quiet forty years: the quiet after war, the quiet of a people no longer braced. It is the quiet of Shabbat, which is how the sixth day ends. The earth had been holding its breath for two and a half thousand years. At Sinai, it let it out.

Coda

The Talmud, in Pesachim 68b, tells of Rav Sheshet, who every thirty days would review all he had learned, then lean against the doorpost and say: Rejoice, my soul, rejoice! For you I have read, for you I have studied. And the Talmud objects: is that so? But Rabbi Elazar said, if not for the Torah, heaven and earth would not endure! How can a man say he studies for his own soul, when the world itself stands on what he is doing?

The Talmud answers gently that a person begins by learning for himself. But the objection is the point. The man leaning on the doorpost thinks he has been feeding his own soul. He has been holding up the sky. Reish Lakish's letter heh means that every page of Torah learned, every commandment kept, is an answer, renewed, late, in a small room, to the question the world asked in the desert. And the earth, somewhere, is a little stiller for it.


Notes

  1. In Avodah Zarah 3a the nations ask for witnesses; God says heaven and earth will testify; the nations object that heaven and earth have a stake in the verdict, "for if not for My covenant day and night, I would not have set the laws of heaven and earth" (Jeremiah 33:25); and the Talmud brings Reish Lakish's condition and Chizkiya's two moments as proof that they do.
  2. Chizkiya was the son of Rabbi Chiya, the great compiler of traditions who came from Babylonia to Judah in the days of Rabbi Judah the Prince; he lived in Tiberias and was an older contemporary of Rabbi Yochanan. Reish Lakish, Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish, was Rabbi Yochanan's brother-in-law, study partner, and most relentless opponent in argument, a man who, the Talmud says, had been a gladiator or a bandit before Rabbi Yochanan drew him into the study hall. His sayings tend to be sharp and structural, and this is one of them: a single letter, read as a hinge on which the world turns.
  3. Pirkei Avot 1:2; Bereshit Rabbah 1:1. The verse from Jeremiah was read by Rabbi Elazar (Pesachim 68b) and Rabbi Eliezer (Nedarim 32a) to mean exactly what it says: without Torah, no heaven and earth.
  4. Rashi on Genesis 1:31 gives both of Reish Lakish's readings: the heh means God made creation conditional on Israel's accepting the five books of the Torah; or that everything made in the six days "hung suspended until the sixth day, the sixth of Sivan, prepared for the giving of the Torah." Either way the grammar of the creation story is read as a promise about its future. This is how aggadata thinks: it treats the Torah's smallest irregularities as doors, and walks through them into the largest questions.
  5. Maharal, Tiferet Yisrael, chapter 32, the same chapter cited in the previous essay. The threat to Israel and the threat to creation are, for him, the same threat seen from two sides.